Hazard band classification for chemical exposure control decisions — COSHH Essentials / GHS approach, aligned with AIOH 2026
How to use this tool
Select the hazard band (from GHS classification or OEL range), quantity handled per task, dustiness or volatility, and the ventilation control in place. The tool applies the semi-quantitative control banding approach from COSHH Essentials (UK HSE) — the same approach underlying AIOH Simplified Occupational Hygiene Risk Management Strategies, 3rd ed. (Firth, Golec & Di Corleto, 2026), Table 3.10 — to determine the minimum recommended control band (CB1–CB5). Quantity and dustiness/volatility categories align directly with AIOH 2026 Table 3.10.
1
Hazard band — based on GHS classification or OEL range
2
Quantity — amount used or handled per task
3
Dustiness (solids) or volatility (liquids)
4
Ventilation control in place
Make selections above to determine the recommended control band.
This tool implements the semi-quantitative control banding approach described in UK HSE COSHH Essentials (HSG193). Quantity, dustiness/volatility, and ventilation categories align directly with AIOH Simplified Occupational Hygiene Risk Management Strategies, 3rd ed., Table 3.10 (Firth, Golec & Di Corleto, February 2026, Australian Institute of Occupational Hygienists Inc.). Control banding is a qualitative screening tool — it does not replace a full quantitative exposure assessment where one is practicable. Band E substances are subject to specific regulatory requirements under applicable WHS legislation and require specialist occupational hygiene advice regardless of the control band result.
Control band definitions
Control bands define the type and intensity of controls required based on the combined hazard band, quantity, dustiness/volatility, and ventilation already in place. They are substance-independent — the same band applies to any substance meeting the criteria.
Control band descriptions and control measures
CB
Control type
Typical measures
Examples
CB1
General ventilation
Natural or mechanical general ventilation. Good housekeeping. Standard PPE (gloves, safety glasses).
Dilute cleaning products, low-volatility lubricants, many food-grade substances
CB2
Engineering controls — LEV
Local exhaust ventilation (LEV) at point of generation. Enclosed process preferred. Respiratory protection as back-up only.
Solvent-based paints, moderate-hazard dusts (wood dust), most laboratory chemicals
CB3
Contained process / enclosure
Enclosed or near-enclosed process. High-efficiency LEV. Respiratory protection (half-face, FFP3 or higher) as supplementary control. Airborne monitoring required.
Isocyanates (limited quantities), fine respirable silica, high-volatility solvents with low OEL
CB4
Specialist advice required
Specialist occupational hygienist assessment required. Likely full enclosure with remote handling. Continuous monitoring. Stringent health surveillance.
Specific statutory controls apply regardless of quantity or conditions. Prescribed measures, OEL compliance monitoring, and health surveillance are legally mandated.
Flour, silica flour, fine pigments; acetone, DCM, diethyl ether, petrol
Primary reference: AIOH Simplified Occupational Hygiene Risk Management Strategies, 3rd ed. (Firth, Golec & Di Corleto, February 2026, Australian Institute of Occupational Hygienists Inc.) — Table 3.10 (quantity, dustiness/volatility & ventilation), Appendix 2 (GHS consequence rating), and Section 2 (hierarchy of controls). Table 3.10 is itself derived from UK HSE COSHH Essentials (HSG193). Additional frameworks: EMKG (Germany BAuA), Stoffenmanager (Netherlands). Control banding is a screening approach — it does not replace quantitative exposure assessment where practicable.